Question

第二節 書面表達（滿分25分）
據各新聞媒體報道，1月19日，一位游客為看馬在鱷魚嘴下逃生的血腥場面，不惜花一筆不小的資金買了一匹馬投到位于�？谑械哪咸�鱷魚湖中，讓30多條兇殘的鱷魚追著它咬。此事引起不少游客的反感，并在社會上引起討論。請你根據下列提示寫一篇英語短文。
要求：1．要包含提示的要點；
2．120詞左右；
3．必須談出自己的觀點。

現象	用活馬喂鱷魚，觀看逃生的血腥場面
態度一	鱷魚湖作為一個知名的旅游景點，絕對不能搞如此血腥的旅游項目。旅游本身是一種健康文化的傳播，是生態文明的體現。這場表演完全是在宣揚一種野蠻的文化。這是一種極不尊重生命的行為。
態度二	活雞活鴨與活馬都同屬動物，既然可用活雞活鴨等動物喂鱷魚，為何不能活馬來喂？否則，等于肯定動物的生命有貴賤之分。如果不允許用活馬喂食鱷魚，那么也不該用活雞鴨喂鱷魚。如果只同情活馬而不同情活雞鴨的話，這就是一種假慈悲。

Answer 1

It is reported that a tourist recently threw a strong healthy horse purchased at his own expense into a pool crowded with up to 30 fierce crocodiles hunting desperately for something to eat . What a breathtaking scene it was to see a horse alive being torn apart by those hungry sharp teeth ! The tourist got a high level of excitement and satisfaction as he was watching the expensive animal suffer and how to struggle in a losing battle . The bloody fight created quite a stir among visitors and readers , which resulted in a heated discussion and mixed response to this issue .
Some visitors at the scene were not a little shocked . They strongly protested such a merciless and nasty program launched by Crocodile Lake , a Well known tourist destination , adding that such a cruel form of amusement should not be allowed . Their views were based on their personal understanding of significance of tourism which aims to promote civilization . Tour industry , they argued , should be a window to eco-friendly system . The tourist misconduct in fact encouraged evil spirit or environment and it showed disrespect for value of life .
Others , however , thought it was not a big deal . Chicken and duck were used alive to feed crocodile and people got used to that . So why not a horse ? Life itself should not be rated or valued n terms of its form .No life is invaluable or worthless just because it is a horse or a chicken . Clinging to one animal rather than another is considered immoral and lack of sense of true mercy .
In my opinion , …

解析